Quality Monitor™ code analysis: the view (by yWorks) shows packages (green) and libraries (jars, blue) using another. Some jars are ”dead” (grey), i.e., are never used.
Quality Monitor™ documentation analysis: the view (by yWorks) shows cross-references of documents (boxes) belonging to different chapters (same color same chapter). Documents of the same package are coherent and loosely coupled to documents of other chapters. This is good for understanding the documents.
Quality Monitor of Our Publications
This Quality Monitor automatically assesses our Publications and derives reliable information useful for both readers and authors.
Readers benefit as they can
- See the top publications at a glance allowing for goal directed reading,
- Understand similarities between publications for avoiding redundant reading,
- Trace references between publications for finding fundamental papers directly.
- Optimize our publication strategy,
- Spot and fix bugs promptly.
|
Overall quality of our Publications. For each publication, we analyze the number of citations (impact 28%), the reputation of the respective conference/journal (impact 28%), how central is the paper in our publications (impact 11%), how complete is the meta-information and is the PDF available (impact 11%), how old is the paper (negative impact 11%), and finally how unique it is (impact 11%). |
|
Overall quality of our Publications aggregated to the resp. year of publication. |
|
Basic metrics of our Publications. |
|
Basic metrics of our Publications aggregated to the resp. year of publication. |
|
Clones between our Publications. |
|
Cross-references between our Publications. |
